Blaming The Solution

Some 40 years ago children and teens it was normal to take their guns to school. Many schools even have shooting ranges. However, today they are extremely rare and you no longer see kids with rifles on their back walking to school, nor rifle racks in the back of trucks school parking lots.

Today, almost all schools have ban guns if they have not already been banned by local state laws. And unlike 40 years ago, there have been many mass shootings. Despite this people are blaming the guns, not the areas that are attracting these shooters to them. Areas like schools that can no longer fight back or have almost no resistance.

Earlier this month there was yet another mass shooting at a school that was a gun free zone. Sending a shiver up my spine, more so when I think about how it could happen at my son’s school. And like usual, there’s a push to ban a tool.

When I look at the situations with this Valentine’s Massacre, we find that so many things had gone wrong. Yet, it is the guns that are being blamed. The shooter himself even said he was going to become a school shooter in a public forum. Yet no law enforcement agency acted on it, doing anything to stop this monster from killing others. He also had many other posts on the internet talking about how he wanted to shoot people and die fighting. Instagram and YouTube have these comments reported to them and did nothing.

Well this happened over the course of 7 years, Police had shown up to his house 39 time and could not or did not take any action. Even the Uber driver that drove him to the school dropping him off with a rifle bag and did not report this to anyone.

This was a failure in every way. From how nearly everyone just ignored every red flag with this shooter. Ignoring every sign, not reporting what they had seen, police inaction, even removing people’s ability to defend themselves by creating a gun free zone. Yet, it is a tool, a firearm that is getting the blame. A tool that could have been in the hands of a good guy at this school that could have stopped this early on.

You want to blame some, blame the people who see the shooters post about shooting up schools and did nothing. Want to blame something, blame the system that did nothing. But don’t blame the solution, firearms. Or you will just make the problem worse.


How to reduce gun deaths without gun control.

After every mass shooting the first reaction of many people is to demand gun control. Ironically, if such people are asked what law do they want, a law that would have stopped the shooting, we find they dont have any ideas. The reason for this is because when forced to think about it, they realize that no law would work on such people.

After all, if such people are willing to break our highest law of the land, murder… Which has life in prison and even the death penalty attached to it. Then they are not going to be worried about a law that they can easily ignore. Made worse is how we see, that if they can’t get the firearms legally, it easy to get them illegally.

Now I’m not arguing how we should not have laws, no I see them as great after the fact ways of putting them behind bars. It’s just that they do nothing to stop or reduce people from going on killing sprees with firearms. They only work after they kill someone.

What may come as a surprise to the pro-gun control people is how we actually can reduce gun violence without gun control laws. That’s because because the solution is not new laws and regulations of firearms. The solution is to look at what are the motivations and locations people do this at. So here is a list of things we can do to reduce gun violence.

1.) End the war of drugs:

Most murders where a firearm is used are drug/gang related. From a drug deal gone wrong, to an addict who robs a store to get money to fuel his or her addiction. So, if we end our war on drugs, controlling it and stop discriminating people who use drugs, we are removing the main reason that people kill other people.

With something like 80% of all firearm related murders being drug related that could translate into almost a 80% reduction in gun related deaths. Something, no gun control law could ever archive.

2.) Make mass shooters into a laughing stock:

Many, but not all mass shooters tend to be society’s outcasts. In away, they are a byproduct of how people treat others. Which is to say, not very good. However, this is part of human nature making it unlikely we can change that.

Anyway – When we look at the mass shooters, to them, they are trying to get indirect revenge for the way people treated them. So, one solution to this is to take away their ability to feel like this would give them the revenge they want.

To do this, we encourage media outlets and comedians to immediately start mocking them, making the mass shooters a laughing stock. Effectively turning mass shooters into a meme immediately after a shooting and continue for a long time after. Making the next perspective shooter afraid that their so called glorious act will become something they would be to embarrassed to have happen to them if the do it. 

Making them think that that their act of revenge will only make the world make fun far beyond anything they experienced. So instead of cry ing over their atrocity talking about how many people they killed. Start talking making fun of every aspect of their life.

3.) Encourage people to carry a firearm:

Contrary to what many people think, most gun owners leave their firearms at home. If, however people started carrying their sidearms everywhere, mass shooters/killers and criminals could be stopped sooner. As well, if criminals start seeing others commit crimes being met immediately with firearms, it could result in them rethinking their crimes. Thus, not only reducing murder rates, but overall crime rates.

This should also extend to people in the work place as well.

4.) encourage training:

We should never force people to take a firearm training class, but we should encourage it. Even a simple firearm safety class is a good thing. We could even give incentives to encourage people to take such classes, like tax breaks if they can show proof they took such class in that year.

This could reduce accidental deaths, while making people more effective at stopping a criminal or mass shooter.

5.) No longer allow gun free zones:

What is one thing most mass shooters have in common? They go on their shooting spree in areas that are gun free zones, or areas where they think it is unlikely they will met with armed resistance. So, if we remove gun free zones while encouraging people to carry, we could stop shooters sooner, while sending a message to people thinking about doing it.

What is happening in California?

California seems hell bent on doing some very stupid things, while giving the middle finger to the constitution and the people who live their. Leaving me scratching my head and asking, what is happening in California?

Just look at some of the things they have been doing. Things like, reducing the punishment for not telling someone they have AID’s/HIV to a misdemeanor. To hell with the recipient, who now must spend a lifetime taking drugs to stay alive. Oh, let’s not forget about all their gun control laws that are an infringement upon its citizens second amendment rights.

However, now in California, they are charging a man for the crime of criticizing Islam. That’s right, apparently it is a crime in the state of California to express your opinion about a religion that is completely incompatible with the Western world. A religion where its believers seems so unable to defend their police with reason and logic, that they need laws in place to prevent others from even saying anything that reveals just how dumb Islam is.

Our first amendment protects everyone’s right to free speech. Not just mine, Christianity, Judaism, islam, males, females, whites, blacks, etc… it is meant for every America. Yes, this even includes hate speech and obsessive speech. Yet in California, saying something offensive to Muslims is now a crime.

Of course we won’t see the SJW, ANTFA, etc…. Come out and protest this injustice as this is what they want too. They are the useful idiots who are only helping to strip peoples rights away.

If someone criticized Christianity, or attempted to attack what I believe, I would not cry and want to have them silenced, face fines or go to jail. Instead, I would be one of the first persons defend their constitutional right to say whatever they want, even if they are wrong. I would even defined their right to do so in court.

I am thankful that I don’t live there. However, California should be seen as a warning to us all. A warning that it can happen here too. So, it tells us we need to help the few people left in California that are still fighting for people’s rights. Because, if they can get away with it there, it will spread out among other states and become harder to stop.

The left is not liberal.

What I am about to say may seem kind of strange to some. Mainly because there was a time when the left and liberals were synonymous with each other. However, that is no longer the case. The left are no longer liberal if anything they have become the anti-liberal.

In a ironic twist, the right has begin to shift towards being liberal. Even the alt-right which is made up of some very racist people, have become more liberal then the left is today. Now I understand many people may be yelling at their monitors after reading, but let me make my case.
Most people don’t really know what a liberal is. When they hear the word, they tend to automatically think Democrat or the left.  It’s as if it’s just simply another label used for them and they would be wrong.
However, being a liberal simply means you believe people should be free and independent, or if you will a person believe in Live and Let Live. 
Doing a quick search online reveals the following definition for what a liberal is.




1. open to new behavior or opinions and willing to discard traditional values. “they have more liberal views toward marriage and divorce than some people”

favorable to or respectful of individual rights and freedoms. “liberal citizenship laws”
“the values of a liberal society” (in a political context) favoring maximum individual liberty in political and social reform.

Now that you’ve read that, let me ask you something. When colleges and student groups go around trying to silence others from being heard, is that liberal or is it oppressive? 
These students and colleges that don’t want other opinions to be be heard are literally oppressing another person’s freedom to speak and be heard all because they disagree with it. They’re not open to new ideas, or opinions, they’re not being respectful to their rights and individual freedoms. Instead they’re trying to force their collectivist ideas onto others while being the only voice heard.
At the Berkeley protest, that resulted in violent outbreaks to stop and silence the Free Speech protesters. As well as the violence that broke out the silence Milo yiannopoulos. It wasn’t the left or the progressives talking about tolerance for new ideas and different opinions, it was people on the right who did. It was Trump supporters, even the racist/white supremacist we’re the ones talking about it. Talking about how they disagree with people, but respect their right to be heard. Why the left did everything they could to silence the other side.
Needless to say, I never thought I’d see the day when a white supremacist was on the right side of history for once.

Even when Christians, Christians that belive homosexuality is wrong (not all of us do), refuse to bake a cake they are attacked by the left and sued for not participating in doing what they feel is a morally wrong thing to do.  
Is the owner of the shop free to live their lives how they want, when they are forced to do something they don’t want to do? Is the homosexual couple displaying liberty? How about when religious companies that are forced to pay for healthcare that allows for abortion, effectively making them pay for other people to kill their own born child? Of course not.
A true liberal would let others to speak and not use violence to silence them. They would let the free-market take effect when it came to that baker. They would not force a company and its owners to pay for abortion or birth control. Nor would a liberal sue a company for not baking them a cake.
The pendulum has now shifted, it is the many who are on the right who are becoming liberal. More liberal then left has been in some time. Even hateful racist and homophobic groups now are the new liberals in a ironic twist of fate. As there was a time when the right and those groups on the right didn’t want other groups or individuals with dissenting opinions be heard.
Now with left and progressive behaving as typical fascist do. As they grow more and more intolerant of other who do not conform to their collective mentality and ideas, to the point of useing violence against anyone who is not in agreement with them. They’ve lost the title of liberal. As they cannot tolerate anybody who does not think as they do. 
It is definitely interesting to live in these times and watch as the pendulum swings. Remember there was a time when it was the right who helped free the slaves and fought for people’s individual freedoms and then the pendulum switch to the left.

Now it’s going back to the right. Where it is the people on the right fighting for are individual freedoms and not just gun rights, but also our freedom of speech 

Now I’m not saying the right is any better than the left but I am saying the right is now the liberal side.

It’s France turn to elect their Trump.

C-LvYmPXgAA1bubWe are starting to see people stand up around the world and say, “enough is enough.” As their leaders, in what can be be described as attempting to deliberately cause the erosion of their own countries.

The United Kingdom had brexit, The United states elected Trump and now France could elect their Trump, La Pen. Who actually wants to try and save her county from the influx of immigration that has led to a huge uptick in terrorist attacks there, and the destruction of their own culture. While Macron, who her competitor in this election. His solution to this is to do nothing and to tell people to just get use to it as they are now part of their life.

C-L-yzcXkAEP8W-.pngOf course its easy for Macron, an old style aristocrat to do nothing, with him living away from the mess, living a highly lavish lifestyle in his expensive home. Because he does not need to experience what other who are not so lucky must deal with due to his decision-making.

Ignoring the corrupt media, which is trying to control who people vote for. I think there is a good chance La Pen could actually win. If she does, it would be interesting to see.

I should note here, that for all the complaining the US is doing about Russia’s influence in our election. The U.S. Does not seem to have any issues with trying to influence the election in France. But mark my words, if La Pen wins, The US will blame it on Russia.

I don’t buy it.

It seems I have grown highly skeptical of anything I hear from the news and our government. In a way, I have learned from resent history just how trustworthy our government is. And I think I have for many good reasons.

Remember why we had gone in and toppled Saddam Hussein? Where we had been being told that he had weapons of mass destruction. Turned out that was a big lie. A lie that has made Iraq much worse place for it. Or how the government has been spying on us in violation of the constitution. Or been putting people in secret prisons without trial?

So, now that we spent millions of dollars to do cosmetic damage to an air base, I don’t think that it’s unreasonable for me to immediately be skeptical of the reasons behind launching the tomahawk missiles. Asking if the excuses the government gave us even make any sense?

The more I think about it, the more it looks like we are being feed a load of bull. So let’s review a few things and ask a few questions too.

1.Bashar al-Assad regime was blamed in the past for using chemical weapons, threatened with US intervention because of the accusation. After many months of an investigation, it turned out that al-Assad regime did not use chemical weapons, but the rebels used it on them self to blame on al-Assad.

2. After the attack al-Assad agreed to dispose of the chemical weapons he did have with the help of Russia.

3. Both the UN and the US investigated and found and signed off that al-Assad had destroyed all his chemical weapons.

4. al-Assad Was winning the war and had no need to use chemical weapons, So why would he do so risking it all and becoming the next Saddam Hussein?

5. Why would Russia know about it and do nothing knowing it would make them look bad?

6. Remember US has been blaming Russia for hacking the elections and has yet to put forth any evidence for it making it look like the US is trying to make Russia look bad.

7. The use launched an attack before an investigation was completed.

8. The U.S only says there is evidence for their claims, but refuses to show it.

9. Wikileaks shown us that the US had wanted long before this happened to take out Syria government.

Looking at this list, what reason do I have to believe what our government and media is telling us about Syria?

Liar liar pants on fire.

Louise rosealma has found out the hard way that some men will treat women as their equal after one man had punched her in the face when protesters for free speach (alt-right) clashed  with ANTIFA ( who ironically are a group of fascist who say they are anti-fascist), who had been attacking the Free Speech protesters. Click here for the video of it.

Ms. rosealma, our snowflake, who is now crying about being punched by a man. Doesn’t appear so innocent when we start doing a little investigative work. You see, before she ever had gone to the protest she said something very interesting in her Twitter feed.

When she talks about how she wants a hundred scalps, it almost makes it look like she is looking for a fight, a physical fight at that. And as we start looking around more, we can see from other photos, that she was wearing padded gloves. You know, the kind you would wear if you were planning on getting into a fight.

Kind of like the one here.

Oh but it doesn’t end there. You see the same man who had been seen puching her in the video, also had gone Toe to Toe with just moments earlier. Supposably, because she was putting fireworks inside of glass containers that were blowing up and injuring people. Basically she was making IED’s. And this man who punched her, did so to stop her.

So, now after she got punched and she’s giving the media a sob story that doesn’t line up with even what we see in the video, she set up a go fund me page asking for $45,000 for medical expenses, four little cut on her nose, that magically healed moments after she was punched.

So yeah, of course I’m not buying it, but I’m sure there’s going to be a lot of social justice Warriors and feminists, who are going to donate.