An intresting Trump win theory

As we know, the media has declared Trump the winner, even though not a single ognization has cirtified the count for any state. Additinaly, Trump is fighting in court to get the counts to flip for him.

Now my guess is he should at lest get pennsylvania (PA) to flip a huge number of votes for him, as there was a very clear case of election laws being violated. That’s because the PA ledgstrater did not approve ballets being counted after the end of election day. the state comstatuion makes it clear that only the ledustrator and only the ledgistratot can make changes to the election. The state suprem court over ruled this due to covid, but its clear the state constatuion does not give the state supreemcourt the power to over rule the constatution due to COVID and go over the ledgtraters head.

So clearly, there a good chance Trump will win this law suit. but lets say he does, and somehow its enough to flip PA to Trump. He would need more the PA, simply put, he needs a miracle.

Now here comes my theory. Maybe Trumps not looking for a mirrical, not looking tonwin in court. Maybe, at least in this one case Trumps playing 4D chess and not just failing upwards.

CouldnTrump be intiencnaly trying push so many lawsuits to jam uonth courts and prevent the cirtifcation process from happening?

If this was the case, and we can’t get certification die to all the litigation, the 12 amendment would kick in. With the 12 amendment saying, simply put, the House of representatives would choose the next president. If it gets that point, it looks to be in Trumps favor. So Trump could be using the system and the constitution to become president for another 4 years.

It would all be perfectly legal, though morally, I would say no. In the end it’s ok to ask, is he that smart enough, actually playing 4d chess? If so, would he actually try it?

Anyway – this was just an interesting theory I was thinking about. I don’t think it will happen, I just think it could.

If I was President, what would I do?

​If I was president, and the House and Senate had been packed with people that agreed with me, so I could vet things done to make America a better place, here is what I would do.

General laws:

• Pass a law to end qualified immunity for police officers.
• I would repeal The Contempt of Court Act, and pass a new bill that protects people from judges who would put people from judges you simply don’t like what people say, and provide them with the ability to fight and even have a jury trial for the accusation of being held in contempt.
• I would pass a law that bans male genital mutilation on children, a law that mirrors the protection already afforded to females.
• I would encourage states to bring back the state militia and train them. At the same time, because Congress not only has the constitutional power to regulate firearms 2A by “Arming” (AI §8 C16) “The People” (not disarming or restricting people access to firearms, which an infringement per Constitution under 2A), but because congress has duty to do so. I would pass a law requiring all citizens who are not prohibited, two armed with firearms would that would allow The People to successfully conduct their duty per ART I, § 8, CL 15.   People who could not afford it, would be supplied with firearms.
• I would pass a bill allowing medical insurance to cross state lines.
• I would repeal what has now been called Obama Care
• I would pass a law that makes privet companies who impose gun free zones to be liable for anyone injured or killed who could have used a firearm to defend themself or others, but could not becuae of their requirments.
• I would pass a law enforcing reciprocity in all states for CCW holders.
• I would repeal the patriot act.
• Have a new constitutional amendment added making it mandatory for the goverment (Federal and state) to balance it’s budget even in a state of emergency, by vutting spending not incresing taxes and cant be overiden by the president or congress.
• End the failed Drug Prohibition.
• I would pass a Constitutional amendment to protect the unborn.
• I would pass a bill that prevents tech companies such as Twitter and Facebook from Interfering with elections.
• I would Create a new constitutional amendment that Prevents discrimination based upon what political party one is in.

Budget:
I would balance the budget, not by increasing taxes, but reducing spending. To do this I would do the following.

• Freeze all new spending.
• Bring our troops home from all wars in other countries.
• Eliminate all or most oversea military bases, bring our trops home.
• Transfer control of roads and Infertrutuer to the private sector.
• Elimnate all public services and have them funded in a voluntary manner.
• Wall the US postal service to the privet sector.
• Repeal the FICA tax
• Make Social Security privatized, creating private retirement accounts. For people today who are dependent upon it, federal assets would be sold to create private retirement accounts.
• End the failed drug prohibition.
• End the Federal Elections Commission (FEC); Replacing it with a law, that requires anyone who profits from governments be it contractors, employees of the goverment and have them restricted from donating to political campaigns.
• Phase out government employee retirement plans with privet with Social Security plans within 3 years.
• Eliminate all “off-budget” spending.
• Lower government wages to be equal to the private sector emplyees.
• Would repeal all grants and payments to plan Parenthood.

Education:

• I would end all mandates and subsidies for collages to make them more affordable.
• Pass a bill to end government loans for collage, placing all loans in the privet sector.
• Mandate all banks or financial institutions that lain money can only do so for students who complete education are in useful subjects, like medical, engineering, Physics and no loan can be given to anyone taking a single class for subjects that are not useful like, Lesbian dance story, etc.. This must be done prior or 2 years after the loan to insure all money is spent for a quality education that they can pay off their loan for.
• Would mandate parents have control of their education by choosing their schools, and control their child’s educational funding.
• Pass a bill that separates government and education.

Healthcare

• Repeal Obama care (See General Laws).
• I would set up a healthcare system that closly mirrors Thailand healthcare Creating a more fair system that helps the poor.

Trump lost, or so it’s reported to be soon.

​It looks as if Trump has lost his bid for reelection. Sure, they’re going to be recounts, a few states still counting, and ledgation, so he could still win, but at this point, I doubt it Trump can turn it. Lets face it, Biden has won. Of course winning was already very hard for Trump to do. He was up against the largest misinformation campaign against him or anyone, lie after lie about him from the legacy media, and their bias reporting. While at the same time he had to try and cut through a massive move to use censorship, both to prevent the truth about him from getting out, but to prevent any criticism about Joe Biden from getting out. 

He also was up against people who had been destroying ballots. Most appar to be people who worked on their own, or just some crazy individuals who would destroy ballots. That and there have been some cases of dead people to vote, videos of people buying ballots and committing voter fraud, and an anonymous, unverified person claiming fraud against Trump from Project Veritas. So take the source as you will..

Yes, there have been some very odd coincidences, like how Trump managed to win by 5 points or more in every competitive state, except for the ones thay kept pausing the counts and playing mail in ballot shuffle. Not to mention whatbto me looks like attempts at voter suppression, like exaggerating the poll numbers to disincentives Trump voters from voting, or things like signs outside polling stations telling people who to vote for. 
Over time, we may find out if such voter fraud was the actual deciding factor, or had very little impact. At this point it is best we let the courts decided after the evidence is presented to them. Something, I try and tell people to do whem a police officer or a individual shoots a person of cover. Wait until we have all the evidence and see what the courts say. 

Of course that was not all Trump was up aginst, Democrats even aloud their cities to burn and get destroyed, where people died and law and order collapse, all in what looks to me like am attempt to prevent Trump from getting reelected, by blaming him for what was their responsibility. Which says a lot about them not Trump, but Trump was being blamed anyways. In the end, if its their goal and not just incompetence, it managed to work. As Trump will not get a second term, unless he the courts ultamitly make judgments in his favor. Again, that’s unlikely.

He still fought a good fight despite the odd and obstacles he was up against. I even thought that despite it all, Trump was going to cut through all this and win, perhaps even managing a sizable victory out of it, even blogong a post as to why, I clearly was wrong. Though I think I would have been right if the democrats and media played fair, stoped the lies and the news doing their job. However, from my perspective, the democrats corrupt tactics still managed to hand the victory over to Biden. And no doubt this will embolden the Democrats to continue to use what worked for them here in the next election.

Sadly, the negative consequences of Bidens win over Trump will be felt for years to come and will affect us all. Our gun rights may be affected, our taxes will go up, jobs, once agian will move overseas, good chance of more wars. Hell, there may possibly a depression if Joe somehow forces a long lockdown to fight covid, which in turn will get more people hooked on the system for the tiny handouts given, Solidifying the democrat power. Who knows what the total damage will be, but the future does not look very bright. But who knows, maybe it won’t all be bad or maybe Biden will be the best president ever, I doubt it, but I don’t want to create a self fulfilling prophecy, but fighting and arguing with everything Biden does like how the left did with their Trump derangement syndrome, where I see him unable to do any good thus old man bad.

So, I will pray for Biden to do good and hope for the best outcome. 

Why my Prediction.

Some time back, I made a prediction, posting this prediction on a few different social media platforms. My prediction was that

Trump would win. There’s a little bit more to my prediction, as I had added a few additional predictions along with it. But that’s what I had predicted in a nutshell, Trump would win. Though if I were to give a percentage, It would be that trump has a 85% chance at Winning his second term.

So, what I would like to do in this post is talk about why I made this prediction. Keep in mind, I am no Trump fan who thinks he will win simply because I am a Trump fan boy who views him only in a good light. Which I don’t, I personaly don’t like him and I hate how he helped the encrocment on our gun rights. So I am no fan.
So why do I think Trump will win.

Enthusasum:

Poll numbers may say one thing, but if People are not as enthusiastic about it, they are less likely to vote. Don’t get me wrong, I expect more people to vote this year than ever before, on both sides. It’s just ultimately not as many that can vote will vote.

Anyway, what this means, is if you have 100 people and 40 say they will vote Biden and 35 Trump, but the people for Biden are less enthusastic, only 30 may come out. However, if Trump supporters having near 100%, enthusiastic level, they will have a higher voter turnout, and 32 may come out to vote, out numbering Biden voters.
Think of it this way, if a person is really not enthusiastic about their candidate and they have other things you like to do, they may choose not to vote, so instead, they will end up doing other things.
Of course, this is a lot more complicated than I made it here, but I’m just giving one of the reasons as to why.

Mail in voting:

One huge issue with mail in voting is how they can be rejected. The New York Times reported it can me as high as 2 to 1. Even if it’s a fraction of that, it means a lot of votes will not be counted.

Keep in mind, data show’s that it’s mostly first time voters who are affected, and most new voters are Democrats. As well, reports show that Democrats are less like to vote in person out of fear of COVID, meaning more votes will be sent through the mail. Translation, more rejections.
At the same time, Trump supporters are not that fearful of COVID-19 and more likely to show up in person and have their vote counted. While more likely to wait in line for many hours to vote. Again, if a person is less enthusiastic seeing a long line they probably gonna be less likely to bother with it and just go home.

In the end, what this could mean, is that possibly millions of peoples votes will not be counted, most of those will be democrats. Giving Trump the advantage as most of the votes for him will be counted.

This means, that Biden may have more people who vote for him, but because the votes are not counted, Trump Ultimately gets more votes as a result of the rejections.

Inflated pull numbers:

One thing that helped with Trumps victory back in 2016 was the poll numbers being in favor of Hillary. Democrats beloved Hillary was going to win, so they thought, why bother voting? Allowing republicans, a smaller group, to win electoral votes.
Again, this election, we are seeing poll number in favor of the Trumps counter candidate, Biden. With some polls showing a 10 even 12 digit lead. So, this could have the same effect, where people who could vote will chose not to because they will think Biden will win anyway. Again, they may see that long line and think, “Well, Biden is going to win, so I’ll skip it.”
So we can see how this self can affect this election.

Register voters in battleground states:

In most battleground states, people registering to vote are registered as a Republican, in Florida its record braking and there are now more Latinos registering Republican then democrats. Not to mention they’re now Latino parade’s for trump.

If In the key states we seeing such a huge amount of people registering republican vs democrat, this is a good sign that Trump will take a good portion of the battleground states.

Campaigning popular vote versus electoral voter:

The thing Hillary filled at, was that she was not campaigning for the electoral college vote, she was going for the popular vote and seemed to be assuming that the popular vote will translate into the electoral vote. After all, she had the lead in the polls, Which made her look like she was getting the popular vote, so why would they no translate over?

With Biden, we are seeing history repeat its self. He seems to be Companion for this popular vote versus the electoral college.

Trump Russian collusion:

the very thing that was meant to hurt Trump, which has been part of a soft coup, is something that actually has helped Trump. Because what it has done is twofold, it is cost people not to trust the media, who can say something true that’s horrible about Trump but now less people will believe it. The other is that it makes Trump looks like the underdog, who is punching up at the establishment cronies.

Americans really like the underdog, especially when that dog looks like they’re the one being bullied and they’re fighting back. So we root for them to win. Most don’t even really care about the details, we just want to see a bully to Underdog come out Victorious.

Look at the movie The Karate Kid Daniel actually threw the first punch Daniel with a loud mouth, kid who used it against the bigger boy. Arguably Daniel can be seen as the bully. However, because people see Daniel as the Underdog punching up, they end up rooting for him to win.

The same goes for Trump no matter how much of a loudmouth, arrogant ass he is, this made him look like he’s being bullied, thus he is the underdog who is punching up.

The economy:

Prior to COVID, the economy was getting stronger, many labor jobs for returning like in the oil Industries, manufacturing specifically cars. Trump’s tax cuts put more money into people’s pockets. For me personally, it was just over $10,000 a year. Biden threatens that not just because he what the ad new taxes, but because he will not extend the Trump taxes.

There’s a saying, “it’s the money, stupid.” And this is very true in regards to which way people vote. When people look at their paycheck when they look at their tax return making more money and make the other person as the one who threatened to take away thousands, there’s no doubt this will affect the way people vote.

Sure, COVID hit, and the economy took a nosedive, with tens of thousands losing their jobs. However, those who didn’t lose their jobs still we’re looking at Paychecks, and the right has done a great job in educating people to understand the job losses are not a Trump’s fault, but individual states shut down policy, and how Trump has nothing to do with that.

At the same time, people see Trump’s telling the states to end their shutdown and bring back the jobs, letting people get back to work. So the people who have lost their jobs are looking at this, yeah I need my job back, I don’t care about this pandemic, the risks are worth it.

This is dangerous to open back up but not everybody feels the same way and people who are trying to figure out where their next meal is coming from or feed the family identify this a very important issue that’s going to help Drive their vote. As an empty stomach, is a powerful motivator.

Violence in Democratic cities:

When people see violence erupting in cities across the United States, where writers take over entire sections and match through the suburbs, while democrat Governors and mayors tell theirs police to stand down and do nothing, this sends shock waves through voting population.

At the same time, when they see Trump practically begging the democrat-run states to do something or to accept his help and they refuse, wlall while the Biden camp and other Democrats criticize Trump over it trying to put a end to it, and also blaming Trump for what they created, people see this and think about how their safety can be nagitivly effected by a Democrat as their president. Especially when that president wants to limit their ability to defend themselves with the use of firearms.

As well, on top of that, because Democrats (which Biden is part of), could actually do something about this and choose not to, it makes it look like the Democrats are intentionally doing it to try and make Trump look bad. Again, this makes Trump look like the underdog, and the Democrats look like bullies who are willing to allow people’s businesses, livelihoods to be burnt down and people to be killed just to win an election against Trump.

This does not look good in, people die so they will naturally lean to the right.

Choice for VP:

One of the worst choices Biden could have made was him picking Kamala Harris as his vice president. Prior to this person did not like her at all, especially those in the black community as she put so many of them behind bars. She represented everything wrong with the legal system and he chose her.

This was a huge mistake, and many Democrats or even telling Biden, he should not pick her, as many people will not vote for Biden because of her, especially people in the black. He chose to and oh my gosh Twitter, Facebook lit up with people angry over this decision or the Republicans were celebrating at their stupidity, as they felt like they just one four more years of Trump over this bad pick. And bad it was.

This in itself is probably partially why Trump’s that’s such a high approval rating among the black community.

In the end, it’s almost like the Democrats we’re intentionally attempting to lose everything they did and have been doing has effectively helped Trump to the point one may think it was intentional. Of course that unlikely, but tgey have managed to botch this so badly all to get Trump out of office, to the point that either they are incredibly incompetent or it’s done intentionally.

There are other, smaller reasons, but as you can see, I have reasons for my prediction is something, not just some tribalism.

Our rights don’t disappear because of a virus or due to a Governor’s subjective opinion.

A couple in North Carolina was arrested after they decided to exercise their right to peacefully protest, which the first amendment recognizes. They were protesting the lockdown that prevents them from being able to go back to work, allowing them to earn money and feed their family. Which seems like a good reason to protest.

However, the governor has deemed citizens of the United States and of his state, that their rights, specifically their right to protest as nonessential, something that subjective. So, this begs the question, if a Governor can ignore or dismiss a person’s right based on his/her opinion, then are our rights really recognized by the government?

This Governor is not the only one doing this. In California, firearms have been deemed nonessential despite the 2nd Amendment.  We are talking about our rights that are written very clearly into the bill of rights. Rights that our founding fathers recognized as so essential, they are the very first ones mentioned. Hell, they fought a war in part because they ultimately felt the their rights were being violated. 

Now, I have read the Constitution and I have never seen a special clause that says the government will recognize our rights until people get sick and the Governor or any government official for that matter has deemed our rights as nonessential.

That is because The Constitution is not some symbolic document that has no practical application other than for people to sings songs about. It’s the highest law of the land. It does not matter if someone’s opinion is that it’s not essential, because I write are written in law that no opinion by some governor can override.

Our government wasn’t founded under the idea that we are under the rule of someone in powers opinion, but what the Constitution says and recognizes as our right. No Governor gets to overrule our rights based upon their own subjective idea of what is essential or not. If they did then why even bother having a constitution in the first place? 

If someone wants to argue that they think people who are exercising their rights during this pandemic are idiots or putting their lives or others at risk fine, go ahead. However, it’s their right to do so. A pandemic, does not give exclusive authority to Governor’s or the police who are enforcing their rule to ignore people’s rights.

The idea that people are okay with, supporting the actions of the government officials here, is scary to say the least. Think of it this way. One of our rights that we have is the right to vote. If we can suspend people’s right protest or the right to bear arms because of a pandemic. Then why can’t we apply the same reasoning and logic to say the right to vote? After all, it would be done under the idea of keeping people safe, so now President Trump gets to be in the office until the opinion of the people in power say its safe. Effectively allowing the president to remain in office indefinitely.

To many, this may sound like something that would never happen. However, how many people thought it would happen to people’s right to protest? Keep in mind, people have been even tossing around the idea of suspending the right to vote under the guise of Public Safety during this pandemic. So it could happen, and so people who think it’s ok to do so when it comes to the violation of the 1st amendment will have no leg to stand on if their right to vote is effected.

Simply put, our rights don’t disappear because of a virus or because someone’s in power opinion on safety. Where they think that it is perfectly acceptable to violate people’s rights. That’s not how it works in this country, nor should it work this way anywhere.

The government officials who enact such executive orders should be removed from office and sued. Any law enforcement officer who enforces this violation of people’s rights should be charged with a crime under 18 U.S.C. § 242. Section 242

“Whoever, under color of any law,… willfully subjects any person… to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States [shall be guilty of a crime].”

They and their department should also be sued as well. An example must be made out of everyone who has been participating in any and everyway with the orders that violate the right of every citizen of the United States of America. If not, and we don’t come down hard on this now, we will regret this later.

COVID-19: Why the death rate can be so low, but so many deaths at one.

Yesterday, I posted about how we don’t know what the death rate was, though I brushed past how I believed the number would be close to what we see with the flu’s death rate. I did not say much as to why I believed  this, but I did hit at that too.

I’m did however mention how Spain reported million had been infected and so that would mean the death rate would be very low. Now people are reporting the same thing, if the infection has already spread through the population, infection millions, if not most, people, this would bring the fatality rate down.

Now there are reports form the media about a report that says the death rate is less then 0.1%. Keep in mind, this is not a peer reviewed study, like nearly all numbers given. It does however, the numbers are impotent.

Yesterday, I posted about how we don’t know what the death rate was, though I brushed past how I believed the number would be close to what we see with the flu’s death rate. I did not say much as to why I believed  this, but I did hit at that too.

I’m did however mention how Spain reported million had been infected and so that would mean the death rate would be very low. Now people are reporting the same thing, if the infection has already spread through the population, infection millions, if not most, people, this would bring the fatality rate down.

Now there are reports form the media about a study that says the death rate is less then 0.1%

This, however, brings us to a question people ask. That question being, if the fatality rate is so low, why are we seeing so many deaths that it looks like hospitals are being overwhelmed and NYC is burying people in mass graves on a small island?

The answer may be due in large part to how fast the virus moves through the population and the 14 (perhaps 24) day incubation period. If a large part, if not the majority of the population is infected within a short period of time, this means within a short period of time you’ll get most of the deaths associated with the virus in about the same time, overwhelming the system that could handle how the flu. As most people are passing away around the same times instead of being spread out like the flu kills.

Simply put, the reason why it could be we are seeing so many deaths, while the overall number could be around, or even less than that of the flu, is because the deaths are happening within a condensed time frame, while the flu is extended through a long drawn out period of time.

We don’t know what the actual death rate from COVID19 is, here’s why.

Many people are still stating COVID-19 death rates. Sometimes, they are quoting from studies, sometimes from numbers mainstream media seems to pick right out of the air. With few agreeing with each other.  Even studies done by medical expert have numbers that differ from other studies. Keep in mind, very few studies have even gone through the peer review process.

So, any attempt to quote numbers as if true is silly. With that said, I will say my guess is the number is actually going to wind up ultimately being small, closer to what we find with the flu. Partially, As well, I suspect we may be treating COVID-19 patience wrong, and that’s for a  future blog post. Another reason, a very important reason, is that we don’t have numbers in the population. Instead, our numbers are coming primarily from hospital infection rates.

Think about it this, you’re naturally going to find  he highest concentration of people with such affection in the hospital. However, at the same time, they will be the sickest people. Most people who are not sick or happened to be asymptomatic and don’t even know they have, so they will not be going to the hospital. Meaning they will not be counted. 

So lets say you have 10,000 infected people, but only 100 go to the hospital. Out of that 100 people, 1 dies. Then saying 1 out of 100 people die would be inaccurate because you still have 9,900 others infected that are not counted. So the numbers more like 1 out of 10,000. But you can’t know this unless you are tracking numbers outside the hospital.

I have of course oversimplified the situation. However, this is basically what’s happening. People who can hardly breath will go get seen, people who have a small cough or no signs won’t be heading into a hospital to get tested. So we are getting our numbers mainly from the people who check into their local ER. 

What this means is that the amount of infected could be just a few million, or nearly the entire planet. Even Spain has reported they suspect 15 million have been infected that would drop the death rate down dramatically if true. Perhaps far lower than the flu.

Ultimately, to get an accurate number in anyway, we need to study and test the general population.

The COVID-19 numbers are way lower than predicted, but why?

Right now, COVID-19 is still making its way though our population, killing thousands with thousands more most likely to pass away. It is now being noticed that the numbers of dead/infected are going down, not up. The Legacy Media is putting out a bunch of speculations as to why, most of which is just an attempt at clickbaiting in the hopes of getting people to watch or reading their trash.

One reason being given, a reason that is less world ending, is that sheltering at home is working. Something I don’t buy when looking at the numbers. Sure, it had some effect, just doubtful it had the effect a reduce the numbers we have seen. I want to us this post to put forth better explanation. 

Instead, I think a big reason for this, is something I’ve been saying for sometime now, especially on Twitter. It’s that the software used to make predictions about COVID-19 has shown itself to be highly inaccurate what before tough self isolation number had been issued.

You see, the company that puts out this kind of prediction mapping software has a long history of being inaccurate, receiving a lot of well deserved criticism in the past. So far, the software called, “COVID Act Now” doesn’t appear to be to be in any way accurate. In cases it’s wrong by a factor of 400.

Before NY had gone into lock down to the point of arresting people for the constitutional right of peaceful assembly, the software had predicted that by March 19th, there was going to be 5,400 people hospitalized. When in reality that number was around 750. That’s not just wrong by a small acceptable margin of error, that is horribly wrong.

Same with Tennessee that predicted on March, 19th, that there would be 190 cases where people were hospitalized for COVID-19. When that date arrived there only 15 cases. Again, the software is showing itself to be incredibly inaccurate. Sadly, this is the software that governors and even many Health officials are using that is scaring them into locking down their cities and destroying their economies of their states. 

Worse yet, the software used was designed by a Democrat activist group with members actively fighting to get Trump out of office. This is something that I would think could never pass peer review without assurances that their bias isn’t interfering with the outcome. Sadly, this software has not gone through the peer review process. The people who own the software have not even provide their source code for people to check. Meaning there is the possibility intentional skewing of numbers for political reasons.

I am not saying they did, it could just really bad programming, but it is always a possibility that the numbers were messed with in such a way that it was intended to try and make President Donald Trump look bad, or for some other reason. I can only hope that’s not what happened. However, it is hard to explain how their mapping software can be off so badly and always in a way to make it seem like the numbers are larger than they are.

With that said, the people who make the decisions for their states are not medical experts and even their medical experts are not computer experts knowledge on how predictive algorithms work, so they are relying on the results of predictive mapping software to help aid in their decision-making process. When that software is giving bad information, bad choices are going to be made by them in response.

Think about this, how messed up would it be if we shut the economy down, causing Millions to become unemployed, destroying who knows how many businesses because a computer program messed up a line of code.

COVID-19: We could be creating a bigger problem.

There is no doubt that COVID-19, a novel Coronavirus poses a threat. People have died, been hospitalized and there may be long lasting physical effects that individuals may experience throughout the rest of their lives, we just don’t know about that yet.

However, I think we are creating a far bigger problem, that could cost far more lives than if we just did nothing and let this new virus burn through the population. We are creating this problem of how we are reacting and responding to the virus.

Our local and federal government is forcing people to stay home, shutting down businesses, imposing travel restrictions and more. This is causing people to lose their jobs, losing their incomes. Some 3 million people now with potentially up to 43 million people joining them soon.

What do you think will happen once they burn through their savings and remaining food? When they see their children starving? When they are being kicked out of their apartment (or home) for lack of payment? People will get desperate.  This can lead to riots, where people can get killed, crime increasing, such often becomes violent.

What do you think will happen when states lose tax revenues from so many people being out of work, unable to pay income tax, while buying less things generating less state sales taxes? Where the money is going to come from to care for all the people who are no longer putting money into the system but now need handouts? It certainly won’t be pretty.

Keep in mind the federal government has already created 2 trillion dollars out of thin air to help people, business and states.  What do you think this will do to inflation?

Even if we don’t have a huge economic collapse of this, the effects will be devastating. Many more people may die from riots, and committing crimes and defending against crimes, than if we would have just let COVID-19 burn through the population.  And if we have an economic meltdown own, we can add people striving for death.

No one wants to see people die, and we all want to do something to help people in this time of need. However, our good intentions of self isolation/quarantine, shutting the business down, creating money out of thin air may be something we look back on as a huge mistake that cost much more lives than it saved.

Sure, we don’t know for sure how this will play out. I suppose we’ll have a chance to argue about it later on after everything’s said and done. I just think we may be making a far larger problem that will cost lives for many years after the after the treat of virus has passed.

Obama can’t even say the word Christian

This Easter there had been attacks on multiple Christian churches in Sir Lanka. As usual, the politicians tell us how upset over the tragedy and/or give the victims they’re good wishes/prayers. Doing so is mostly political. Not doing would basically would be political suicide.

Obama is no different and so he tweeted about it. However, I noticed something about the latest post on twitter that stood out to me. He never said Christians, he said “Easter worshippers.” Makes you wonder, what is an Easter worshipper? Because Christians don’t worship Easter they worship the Creator.

So who are these Easter worshippers that were harmed? Well, it was Christians. Just for some reason, he didn’t use the word, Christian. It’s also possible that he chose Easter worshipper as a subtle way to attack Christians. To Christians Easter, and perhaps didn’t think anyone would notice.

I can already hear it now from people who will tell me that he’s a Christian man who has gone to church. I’m not ignorant of those claims. I am also aware of a lot of controversy surrounding the church he has gone to.

However, as a man who is a Christian you would think he would know it was not Easter worshippers that were the victims of these attacks, but Christians who had been. So he will know that the idea that Christians are Easter worshippers is wrong and anti-Christian, going against God’s teachings.

So this leaves two possibilities. He either knew what he said was wrong and said it anyway, or he made a mistake and just misspoke. After all, we are human and make mistakes from time to time. Saying things we never actually meant to say. I, however, don’t believe it’s a mistake and here’s why.

Look at this past. It is yet another recent tweet by Obama. Noticed that when a very famous Church caught fire, again no mention of Christians. Instead, he said people of France. Which would include Muslims, Hindus, Buddhist, Sikhs, atheist, etc… despite this still being a loss in general for the general population, it’s a Christian church and he chose once again to omit the word Christians, or at least Catholics who would be the ones suffering the most from this loss.

He’s not the only one who did this. If you look at the media is reporting on this, it was as if they avoided the word Christian as if it would get there FCC license revoked the minute was said, even if by accident. Even using the word church was rare if not absent. It seems to be a new thing that I’ve noticed where the only time Christians are mentioned in Media and by many politicians is when they’re trying to portray Christians the negative light.

Now someone might want to argue that maybe Obama just didn’t want to offend anyone. Kind of like saying happy holidays instead of Merry Christmas. However, we know he has no problem with using the name of a religion when they are the victim of a tragedy. At least when they are not Christian, but Muslims.

Here’s another very recent tweet from Obama.

It seems he can easily point out and say Muslims when they are the victim, just not when the victims happened to be Christians, choosing different words, poorly chosen euphemisms ( or intentional) or includes everybody of a nation over a specific group of people.

When Muslims are victims, it’s clear he’s able to be very specific as to who the victims are. Despite an entire nation suffering, he never said people of New Zealand or koran worshipers. Instead, he was very specific with who the primary victims are, Muslims.

Why is it he can say Muslim when they are the victim, yet cannot do the same with Christians which he claims to be? There’s something odd about this aspect of Obama.